[Tests] Increase QMK test coverage take 2 (#15269)
* Add per-test keymaps * Add better trace and info logs for failed unit-tests * Add layer state assertion with tracing message * Use individual test binaries configuration options * Add basic qmk functionality tests * Add tap hold configurations tests * Add auto shift tests Co-authored-by: Nick Brassel <nick@tzarc.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e20bc76a1e
commit
a24bdccee0
48 changed files with 2702 additions and 245 deletions
|
@ -14,8 +14,11 @@
|
|||
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include "keyboard_report_util.hpp"
|
||||
#include "keycode.h"
|
||||
#include "test_common.hpp"
|
||||
#include "action_tapping.h"
|
||||
#include "test_keymap_key.hpp"
|
||||
|
||||
using testing::_;
|
||||
using testing::InSequence;
|
||||
|
@ -25,14 +28,19 @@ class Tapping : public TestFixture {};
|
|||
TEST_F(Tapping, TapA_SHFT_T_KeyReportsKey) {
|
||||
TestDriver driver;
|
||||
InSequence s;
|
||||
auto key_shift_hold_p_tap = KeymapKey(0, 7, 0, SFT_T(KC_P));
|
||||
|
||||
set_keymap({key_shift_hold_p_tap});
|
||||
|
||||
press_key(7, 0);
|
||||
// Tapping keys does nothing on press
|
||||
key_shift_hold_p_tap.press();
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
|
||||
run_one_scan_loop();
|
||||
release_key(7, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
// First we get the key press
|
||||
key_shift_hold_p_tap.release();
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
|
||||
|
||||
// Then the release
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
|
||||
run_one_scan_loop();
|
||||
|
@ -41,12 +49,21 @@ TEST_F(Tapping, TapA_SHFT_T_KeyReportsKey) {
|
|||
TEST_F(Tapping, HoldA_SHFT_T_KeyReportsShift) {
|
||||
TestDriver driver;
|
||||
InSequence s;
|
||||
auto mod_tap_hold_key = KeymapKey(0, 7, 0, SFT_T(KC_P));
|
||||
|
||||
set_keymap({mod_tap_hold_key});
|
||||
|
||||
mod_tap_hold_key.press();
|
||||
|
||||
press_key(7, 0);
|
||||
// Tapping keys does nothing on press
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
|
||||
idle_for(TAPPING_TERM);
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LEFT_SHIFT)));
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LSFT)));
|
||||
run_one_scan_loop();
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
|
||||
mod_tap_hold_key.release();
|
||||
run_one_scan_loop();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -54,12 +71,16 @@ TEST_F(Tapping, ANewTapWithinTappingTermIsBuggy) {
|
|||
// See issue #1478 for more information
|
||||
TestDriver driver;
|
||||
InSequence s;
|
||||
auto key_shift_hold_p_tap = KeymapKey(0, 7, 0, SFT_T(KC_P));
|
||||
|
||||
set_keymap({key_shift_hold_p_tap});
|
||||
|
||||
press_key(7, 0);
|
||||
// Tapping keys does nothing on press
|
||||
key_shift_hold_p_tap.press();
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
|
||||
run_one_scan_loop();
|
||||
release_key(7, 0);
|
||||
key_shift_hold_p_tap.release();
|
||||
|
||||
// First we get the key press
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
|
||||
// Then the release
|
||||
|
@ -67,19 +88,20 @@ TEST_F(Tapping, ANewTapWithinTappingTermIsBuggy) {
|
|||
run_one_scan_loop();
|
||||
|
||||
// This sends KC_P, even if it should do nothing
|
||||
press_key(7, 0);
|
||||
key_shift_hold_p_tap.press();
|
||||
// This test should not succed if everything works correctly
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
|
||||
run_one_scan_loop();
|
||||
release_key(7, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
key_shift_hold_p_tap.release();
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
|
||||
idle_for(TAPPING_TERM + 1);
|
||||
|
||||
// On the other hand, nothing is sent if we are outside the tapping term
|
||||
press_key(7, 0);
|
||||
key_shift_hold_p_tap.press();
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
|
||||
run_one_scan_loop();
|
||||
release_key(7, 0);
|
||||
key_shift_hold_p_tap.release();
|
||||
|
||||
// First we get the key press
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
|
||||
|
@ -90,8 +112,12 @@ TEST_F(Tapping, ANewTapWithinTappingTermIsBuggy) {
|
|||
// Now we are geting into strange territory, as the hold registers too early here
|
||||
// But the stranges part is:
|
||||
// If TAPPING_TERM + 1 above is changed to TAPPING_TERM or TAPPING_TERM + 2 it doesn't
|
||||
press_key(7, 0);
|
||||
key_shift_hold_p_tap.press();
|
||||
// Shouldn't be called here really
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LEFT_SHIFT))).Times(1);
|
||||
idle_for(TAPPING_TERM);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
|
||||
key_shift_hold_p_tap.release();
|
||||
run_one_scan_loop();
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue