drashna/qmk_firmware
1
0
Fork 0
Code Activity Actions

Revert "[Tests] Increase QMK test coverage (#13789)"

Browse source 
This reverts commit b6054c0206.
This commit is contained in:
Nick Brassel 2021-11-23 09:54:04 +11:00
parent b6054c0206
commit 7746aefe94
49 changed files with 264 additions and 2687 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

48
tests/basic/test_tapping.cpp
View file

@ -14,11 +14,8 @@
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#include "keyboard_report_util.hpp"
#include "keycode.h"
#include "test_common.hpp"
#include "action_tapping.h"
#include "test_keymap_key.hpp"
using testing::_;
using testing::InSequence;
@ -28,19 +25,14 @@ class Tapping : public TestFixture {};
TEST_F(Tapping, TapA_SHFT_T_KeyReportsKey) {
TestDriver driver;
InSequence s;
auto key_shift_hold_p_tap = KeymapKey(0, 7, 0, SFT_T(KC_P));
set_keymap({key_shift_hold_p_tap});
press_key(7, 0);
// Tapping keys does nothing on press
key_shift_hold_p_tap.press();
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
run_one_scan_loop();
release_key(7, 0);
// First we get the key press
key_shift_hold_p_tap.release();
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
// Then the release
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
run_one_scan_loop();
@ -49,38 +41,25 @@ TEST_F(Tapping, TapA_SHFT_T_KeyReportsKey) {
TEST_F(Tapping, HoldA_SHFT_T_KeyReportsShift) {
TestDriver driver;
InSequence s;
auto mod_tap_hold_key = KeymapKey(0, 7, 0, SFT_T(KC_P));
set_keymap({mod_tap_hold_key});
mod_tap_hold_key.press();
press_key(7, 0);
// Tapping keys does nothing on press
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
idle_for(TAPPING_TERM);
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LEFT_SHIFT)));
run_one_scan_loop();
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
mod_tap_hold_key.release();
run_one_scan_loop();
}
TEST_F(Tapping, ANewTapWithinTappingTermIsBuggy) {
// See issue #1478 for more information
TestDriver driver;
InSequence s;
auto key_shift_hold_p_tap = KeymapKey(0, 7, 0, SFT_T(KC_P));
set_keymap({key_shift_hold_p_tap});
press_key(7, 0);
// Tapping keys does nothing on press
key_shift_hold_p_tap.press();
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
run_one_scan_loop();
key_shift_hold_p_tap.release();
release_key(7, 0);
// First we get the key press
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
// Then the release
@ -88,20 +67,19 @@ TEST_F(Tapping, ANewTapWithinTappingTermIsBuggy) {
run_one_scan_loop();
// This sends KC_P, even if it should do nothing
key_shift_hold_p_tap.press();
press_key(7, 0);
// This test should not succed if everything works correctly
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
run_one_scan_loop();
key_shift_hold_p_tap.release();
release_key(7, 0);
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
idle_for(TAPPING_TERM + 1);
// On the other hand, nothing is sent if we are outside the tapping term
key_shift_hold_p_tap.press();
press_key(7, 0);
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(_)).Times(0);
run_one_scan_loop();
key_shift_hold_p_tap.release();
release_key(7, 0);
// First we get the key press
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_P)));
@ -112,12 +90,8 @@ TEST_F(Tapping, ANewTapWithinTappingTermIsBuggy) {
// Now we are geting into strange territory, as the hold registers too early here
// But the stranges part is:
// If TAPPING_TERM + 1 above is changed to TAPPING_TERM or TAPPING_TERM + 2 it doesn't
key_shift_hold_p_tap.press();
press_key(7, 0);
// Shouldn't be called here really
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport(KC_LEFT_SHIFT))).Times(1);
idle_for(TAPPING_TERM);
EXPECT_CALL(driver, send_keyboard_mock(KeyboardReport()));
key_shift_hold_p_tap.release();
run_one_scan_loop();
}
}